Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 02:27

Let’s just make it real clear:
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Minnesota Vikings News and Links: Another Day OF OTAs! - Daily Norseman
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Why do many women like tall men?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Why am I so afraid that gun owners have set traps to kill me outside my house or my car?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Nam eos consequatur amet quis qui dolorem optio.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
F1's Canadian GP will clash with the Indy 500 every five years - Motorsport.com
Thank you.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.